A shout out to people who aren't from MICA, I have a class called "Electronic Media and Culture" that requires me to blog certain things, which is what this post will be. I'll let you know in the title if the post if for class or not with "(EMAC)". Posts for class will tend to be more educational and critical based as opposed to artistically based. Well, allons-y~!
The Common Object.
And what is more mundane than a dish cloth? Not much really.

 |
|



The exhibit is one of the most boring thing to see. Yes there are nice pieces, which will be elaborated on later, but given the over all nature of the show, there is little to no room for excitement. The gallery collection is based on the singular shared object, placed in the very center of the first show space, and you the viewer cannot interact with it in any way. Sure, the paintings are all done (for the most part) very nicely, but that's all they are, nice paintings. They are a dime a dozen and none of them offer a fresh perspective of the time honored still life. I concede that they are, for the most part, bright and airy paintings; a deviation from the standard dark gloomy still-lives of traditional museum pieces which places it a hair's breadth above the former. Regardless, still-lives are only still lives, and can only capture attention for so long; in my case, a few nanoseconds. Anther parallel/analogy I can draw from this exhibit is that these paintings are like cats. I like cats, therefore I like this show. However, once I leave the immediate presence of the show, I completely forget everything I saw because it is so ubiquitous and non-unique. Same goes for cats. I will find one on the streets, I might pet it, or I might walk right by it, and only take away that I passed a cat on the way to class.
There were two redeeming works that save this show from total boredom, which are shown below:
So this wins the title of most interesting piece in the show because there is a figure (fine, a portrait) interacting with the common object. Also two different planes within the painting create a sense of unease or confusion because the viewer wants to imagine that the person is wearing the still life as a hat of sorts, while the perspective on the fruits shouts that it is lying on the floor at a different angle. This contrast creates the most interesting internal dialogue in the entire gallery. Sadly.

This painting earned its place as one of the most interesting pieces in the show because it refuses to show the towel unfurled and in a familiar setting. Instead the audience is given a rolled towel and seven mysterious boxes. Since the somewhat hard to recognize wash cloth is juxtaposed next to those boxes, the viewer initially doesn't realize why this piece belongs in the show. Only once you take the time to think about what the painting entails do you understand why it belongs in the gallery. Also, I like the random mystery boxes, they are nicely designed o give you no hints as to their function, and one just looks plain rad.
Well that is all for now!
Ta ta, see you next time!
-Ben